Sans-culottes
Hatred is the most accessible and comprehensive of all unifying agents. …
Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a God,
never without belief in a devil.
— Eric Hoffer (1902 – 83)
Hillary Clinton (1947):
[To] be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. …
They're racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic … you name it.
[But,] unfortunately, there are people like that.
And he has lifted them up. …
But the other basket are … people who feel that:And they’re just desperate for change. …
- the government has let them down,
- the economy has let them down,
- nobody cares about them,
- nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures.
Those are the people we have to understand and empathize with.
(Amy Chozick, Hillary Clinton Calls Many Trump Backers "Deplorables," and GOP Pounces,
The New York Times, 10 September 2016)
Mitt Romney (1947):
There are 47% of the people:These are people who pay no income tax. …
- who will vote for [President Obama] no matter what …
- who are dependent upon government,
- who believe that they are victims …
- who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them …
- who believe they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, [and that] the government should give it to them. …
[My] job is not to worry about those people.
I’ll never convince them that they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.
(David Corn, Romney Tells Millionaire Donors What He Really Thinks of Obama Voters, Mother Jones, 17 September 2012)
Ross Garnaut (1946):
In the United States … high incomes have risen [thoughout the period since the Great Crash of 2008,] while those of ordinary citzens have fallen. …
[If] living standards for ordinary people continue to fall, this will have large and unpredictable ideological and political effects.
(Dog Days, 2013, p 30)
Eric Hoffer (1902 – 83)
The main requirements [of a mass movement leader] seem to be: …
- a fanatical conviction that he is in possession of the one and only truth;
- faith in his destiny and luck;
- a capacity for passionate hatred;
- a cunning estimate of human nature;
- a delight in symbols (spectacles and ceremonials); [and]
- [an] unbounded brazenness which finds expression in a disregard of consistency and fairness …
The quality of ideas seems to play a minor role in mass movement leadership.
What counts is
- the arrogant gesture,
- the complete disregard of the opinion of others,
- the singlehanded defiance of the world.
[The] mass movement leader … draws his inspiration from the sea of upturned faces, and the roar of the mass is as the voice of God in his ears.
He sees an irresistible force within his reach — a force he alone can harness. …
The reason that the inferior elements of a nation can exert a marked influence on its course is that they are wholly without reverence toward the present.
They see their lives and the present as spoiled beyond remedy and they are ready to waste and wreck both: hence
- their recklessness, and
- their will to chaos and anarchy.
Thus, they are among the early recruits
- of revolutions,
- [of] mass migrations, and
- of religious, racial and chauvinist movements,
The ideal potential convert is the individual
- who stands alone,
- who has no collective body he can blend with and lose himself in and so mask the pettiness, meaninglessness and shabbiness of his individual existence. …
A rising mass movement attracts and holds a following not
- by its doctrine and promises, but
- by the refuge it offers from the anxieties, barrenness and meaninglessness of an individual existence.
- by conferring on them an absolute truth, or
- by remedying the difficulties and abuses which made their lives miserable,
It is futile to judge the viability of a new movement by
- the truth of its doctrine, and
- the feasibility of its promises.
Where new creeds vie with each other for the allegiance of the populace, the one which comes with the most perfected collective framework wins. …
The self-mastery needed in overcoming their appetites gives [the frustrated] an illusion of strength.
They feel that in mastering themselves they have mastered the world. …
All active mass movements strive … to interpose a fact-proof screen between:
- the faithful, and
- the realities of the world. …
He cannot be:
- frightened by danger, nor
- disheartened by obstacles, nor
- baffled by contradictions,
The rule seems to be that those who find no difficulty in deceiving themselves are easily deceived by others. …
The fanatics of various hues … are ready to fly at each other’s throat.
But they are neighbors and almost of one family.
They hate each other with the hatred of brothers. …
And [so] it is easier for a fanatic Communist to be converted to fascism, chauvinism or Catholicism than to become a sober liberal. …
It is easier to hate an enemy with much good in him than one who is all bad.
We cannot hate those we despise. …
The Americans are poor haters in international affairs because of their innate feeling of superiority over all foreigners.
An American’s hatred for a fellow American (for Hoover or Roosevelt) is far more virulent than any antipathy he can work up against foreigners.
It is of interest that the backward South shows more xenophobia than the rest of the country.
Should Americans begin to hate foreigners wholeheartedly, it will be an indication that they have lost confidence in their own way of life. …
The practice of terror serves the true believer not only
- to cow and crush his opponents, but also
- to invigorate and intensify his own faith.
- intimidates the Negro, but also
- invigorates the fanatical conviction of white supremacy. …
The creed whose legitimacy is most easily challenged is likely to develop the strongest proselytizing impulse.
It is doubtful whether a movement which does not profess some preposterous and patently irrational dogma can be possessed of that zealous drive which "must either win men or destroy the world."
(The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements, 1951)
To an outside observer, an individualist society seems in the grip of some strange obsession.
Its ceaseless agitation strikes him as a kind of madness. …
When we are conscious of our worthlessness, we naturally expect others to be finer and better than we are.
We demand more of them than we do of ourselves, and it is as if we wished to be disappointed in them.
Rudeness luxuriates in the absence of self-respect. …
Now that the new industrial revolution is on the way to solving the problem of means, … it behooves us to remember that man's only legitimate end in life is to finish God's work — to bring to full growth the capacities and talents implanted in us.
A population dedicated to this end will not necessarily overflow with the milk of human kindness, but it will not try to prove its worth by proclaiming the superiority and exclusiveness of its nation, race, or doctrine.
(The Ordeal of Change, 1963)