(The Murdochs: Empire of Influence, CNN, 2022)
Rupert Murdoch (1931):
[There’s] a real challenge to confront: a wave of censorship that seeks:This rigidly enforced conformity, aided and abetted by so-called social media, is a straitjacket on sensibility.
- to silence conversation,
- to stifle debate,
- to ultimately stop individuals and societies from realizing their potential.
To many people have fought too hard, in too many places, for freedom of speech to be suppressed by this awful woke orthodoxy. …
There are many goals still to come and challenges to overcome.
Well, I'm far from done.
(Acceptance Speech, Lifetime Achievement Award by the Australia Day Foundation UK, Australia House, 23 January 2021)
(Jamie Roberts, BBC The Rise Of The Murdoch Dynasty, 2020)
James Murdoch (1972):
There's an inescapable conclusion that we must reach if we are to have a better society:
The only reliable, durable and perpetual guarantor of independence, is profit.
(MacTaggart Lecture, MediaGuardian Edinburgh International Television Festival, August 2009)
Elisabeth Murdoch (1968):
[Profit] without purpose is a recipe for disaster.
(MacTaggart Lecture, MediaGuardian Edinburgh International Television Festival, August 2012)
Rupert Murdoch (1931):
We should approach climate change with great scepticism. …
[How] much are we doing with emissions and so on?
Well, as far as Australia goes, nothing in the overall picture. …
The most alarmist things have said maybe … 3°C in 100 years.
At the very most, one [degree] would … be man-made. …
Now, what that means is that, if the sea level rises 6 inches [the] Maldives might disappear or something …
We can't mitigate that.
We can't stop it.
We've just got to stop building vast houses of sea shores and go back a little bit.
[The world has] been changing for thousands and thousands of years. …
Climate change has been going on as long as the planet is here.
(2014)
Wendy Bacon (1946) [Professorial Fellow, Australian Centre for Independent Journalism]:
One third of articles in Australia’s major newspapers do not accept the consensus position of climate science …
That’s a very high level of scepticism when you consider that these stories are rejecting findings that over 97% of the world’s climate scientists support. …
While the News Corp tabloids tend to outright reject the consensus, the national newspaper The Australian is more likely to suggest that climate science is a matter of debate. …
In the Herald Sun 97% of comment articles were sceptical.
This is largely due to … Andrew Bolt, who wrote over half of all the words on climate science in the paper. …
News Corp’s coverage seems to be more about production of ignorance than informing people so they can participate in debates about solutions. …
The public is paying a heavy price for having News Corp as the dominant player in the most concentrated press in the developed world.
(Big Australian media reject climate science, The Conversation, 1 November 2013)
The newspaper that most actively promotes climate scepticism is also the biggest selling newspaper in Australia, the Herald Sun. …
The next most sceptical publication is The Daily Telegraph …
(A Sceptical Climate: Media coverage of climate change in Australia, 2011 & 2013)
Market Share by Readership(Adapted from Figure 1, p 23) | ||
Ownership | Readership | |
---|---|---|
News Limited | 3,707,000 | 65% |
Fairfax | 1,439,000 | 25% |
Seven West Media | 547,000 | 10% |
Total | 5,963,000 | 100% |
James Painter [Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Oxford University]:
Australia had the most articles, and the highest percentage of articles with sceptics in them, ahead of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Norway and India.
This finding tallied with a previous report we had published which strongly suggested that climate scepticism was common in the English-speaking media in countries like the UK, USA and Australia.
It is nothing like as common in the media in developing countries, such as Brazil, India and China, and in France.
(Climate Change in the Media: Reporting Risk and Uncertainty, I B Taurus, Oxford)
Philip Chubb [Associate Professor of Journalism, Monash University]:
… I'm accusing The Australian of ideological bias.
All the evidence is there.
It's absolutely clear.
It has ceased to function as a news outlet according to the ordinary meaning of that term.
(George Munster Award Forum, University of Technology Sydney, ABC Big Ideas, 2 December 2010)
Would you like to know more?
- Royal Commission Into Media Diversity
- Media coverage of climate change in Australia
- Murdoch's Australian and the Shaping of the Nation
Loyalty is Good
[Our] first responsibility [as journalists, is to earn] the trust and loyalty of our readers.
The newspaper … can throw light on injustices, just as it can do the opposite.
It can hide things and be a great power for evil.
— Rupert Murdoch (1931)
Bill O'Reilly (1949):
If any woman ever breathed a word, I'll make her pay so dearly that she'll wish she'd never been born.
I'll rake her through the mud, bring up things in her life, and make her so miserable that she'll be destroyed. …
If you cross FOX NEWS CHANNEL, it's not just me, it's Roger Ailes who will go after you …
Ailes operates behind the scenes … and makes things happen, so that one day BAM! — the person gets what's coming to them, but never sees it coming. …
So here's the deal: if someone is paying you a wage, you owe that person, or company, allegiance.
You don't like what's happening in the workplace?
Go to human resources or leave, but don't run down the concern that supports you by trying to undermine it.
[O'Reilly] Factor tip of the day — loyalty is good.
Donald Trump (1946):
[Roger Ailes] is a very good person.
I can tell you that, some of the women that are complaining … I know how much he's helped them.
Joe Muto [Former Associate Producer, The O'Reilly Factor, Fox News]:
It was imparted to me, right from the very beginning, that it wasn't about journalism, it was about drawing the biggest audience possible. …
We used to call it: "Riling up the Crazies".
That's what we were there to do.
We were there to stir up outrage.
Because that's what kept them watching.
Glenn Beck (1964):
It's hard when you actually believe in something, and you don't want to do harm but, somehow or another, you just keep doing harm. …
And I remember, praying and hearing: "you're standing in the wrong place."
How am I now, in the position, where I am the most polarizing, divisive figure in the country?
And it was the beginning of: "give it all up, get out … get out, get out, get out."
So I went into Roger's office and said: "I'm leaving" …
(Fox News: Divide And Conquer, 2018)
Nick Broomfield (1948):
[Rupert Murdoch] paid Sarah [Palin:][The] Koch brothers are massive contributors to [both] Sarah and the Tea Party.
- a $3 million salary [as a news analyst for Fox News;] and
- a $7 million [book] advance for Going Rogue.
(Sarah Palin: You Betcha!, Gravity Films, 2011)
Roger Ailes (1940 – 2017):
[At Fox News, we'd] like to restore objectivity, where we find it lacking.
Sarah Ferguson (1965):
[Gretchn Carlson] would eventually settle [her sexual harassment claim] with Fox News for $20 million US dollars. …
[Susan] Estrich negotiated a departure package for [Roger] Ailes — worth more than $70 million US dollars — directly with Rupert Murdoch.
(Fox and the Big Lie, ABC Four Corners, 23 August 2021)